tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post6266722378135514805..comments2024-03-09T10:15:11.266+13:00Comments on Unravelling: True StoryMeghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-52335903502456644412012-05-12T13:28:22.567+12:002012-05-12T13:28:22.567+12:00Re. the Interweave publication, I didn't learn...Re. the Interweave publication, I didn't learn anything new and that ultimately every case needs to be judged in court for its merit proves, once again, that it is a murky area. (And I even read a little bit of the Berne Convention link, oh, my!)<br /><br />On the other hand, with the Internet and all sorts of self-publishing capabilities, I feel the need to learn about them and keep abreast of developments. It's like tax law; I'm so not interested, but it'd be wise to know some of it...Meghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-57078808401099159232012-05-12T01:10:21.116+12:002012-05-12T01:10:21.116+12:00Thanks for your considered comment, Dot. I don'...Thanks for your considered comment, Dot. I don't know what I'd do if something as complicated as this happened to me. But I think we all need to be ready.Meghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-49757641687372988422012-05-12T00:34:03.967+12:002012-05-12T00:34:03.967+12:00In the old days of professional photographers prod...In the old days of professional photographers producing their own prints when I worked in marketing/PR (20 years ago!)the prints would have a label stuck on the back stating copyright and restrictions for use.<br /><br />I agree with the above comment - the professional photographers I worked with retained copyright, but of course you own the rights in design / copyright of an original piece of weaving.<br /><br />When things go this badly wrong, I think the first thing to consider, given that mistakes have been made, is what would you like to see done to put them right - an apology, maybe in the form of a note included (or stuck to) every item where the photo is reproduced? payment for use of the image? a feature in the newspaper in recompense? or are you simply interested in finding ways of preventing this happening again? <br /><br />The Interweave publication is <i> very</i> limited by the way, it does not cover licensing and assignment of rights, and it is entirely about copyright in the USA - doesn't mention the Berne Convention.Dorothyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06488670649558382921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-30718504238066084622012-05-11T18:12:21.953+12:002012-05-11T18:12:21.953+12:00Can't believe I read through this, but the fir...Can't believe I read through this, but the first problem is we don't know who owns the rights, and second we don't know what the agreements were, but still, as a maker, I don't know what I'd do if I saw a photo of my work used to promote an unrelated exhibition. And if I were taking part in an exhibition, I'd be annoyed if the pressed used someone else's photo to promote the exhibition, and further, if the Gallery weren't aware of it.Meghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-48032295551774693542012-05-11T16:07:07.143+12:002012-05-11T16:07:07.143+12:00The photographer usually hold copyright to own pho...The photographer usually hold copyright to own photograph, It is separate from the copyright from actual art work itself. This is generally and usually photographer will issue licence agreement for work done stating where copyright is resist and allowed usage of photograph (i.e. or web only, printed for publication, where that publication can be distributed and so on). If this is not signed as contract with whoever contracted the photographer that will lead quit bit of mess. <br /><br />On the contrary, if the photographer is employed by company and worked solely for them in their paid time and the contract is said the copyright of work (photograph) taken by work time is belong to company (if the staff taken photograph, it is likely the copyright is belong to the company) and this company can use that photograph in anyway without obligation. <br />If the original artist, who made the art work and not photograph, want the copyright of the photograph too, artist has only two choices. <br /><br />1) Make a clear contract with photographer to give up his/companies copyrights – I think this is very difficult or expensive. Oh artist could purchase absolute exclusive licence from photographer which is quite bit of fortune usually.<br />2) Take the photo by yourself and be owner of the copyrights. <br /><br />End of the day, what type of licence was granted from photographer local newspaper is the key. It could be slack management or a=understanding of newspaper (or parent company) to make the photograph available or use for other purpose if that was. BTW, it could be complexly legal within the allowed usage agreed at first place. That is also the possibility. Again The original Artist cannot say anything about it because the artist does not hold the copyright of photograph even hold copyright of art work. (It is similar to wedding photograph contract here.)Ben Nakagawahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01362171644695652901noreply@blogger.com