tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post8659230619995790453..comments2024-03-09T10:15:11.266+13:00Comments on Unravelling: VerdictMeghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-66117830273626357942008-10-18T09:06:00.000+13:002008-10-18T09:06:00.000+13:00Hee hee, now that's a thought! Welcome home.Hee hee, now that's a thought! Welcome home.Meghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-59873198126106512622008-10-17T10:14:00.000+13:002008-10-17T10:14:00.000+13:00okay lets talk technical errors.........the addres...okay lets talk technical errors.........<BR/><BR/>the address is printed in both normal and bold...why?<BR/><BR/>Second sentence is missing a period.<BR/><BR/>"Nirvana" should either be underlined or in quotes, but most certainly not both.<BR/><BR/>"For future National Exhibitions" the For should not be capitalized and again the sentence is lacking a period.<BR/><BR/>"yours sincerely" the Y should be capitalized.<BR/><BR/>And heavens to Betsy just look at that penmanship!<BR/><BR/>Meg, I suggest you return the letter with an attached note that it is unclear due to too many technical errors.<BR/><BR/>Silly Selector!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-30895454891194484622008-09-10T13:15:00.000+12:002008-09-10T13:15:00.000+12:00Yeah, I suppose it's a hard one if we have to do i...Yeah, I suppose it's a hard one if we have to do it. But you know... %$#@!!!!!Meghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-39882385877071840992008-09-10T12:41:00.000+12:002008-09-10T12:41:00.000+12:00ugh! I am really sorry! I have lots of thoughts ...ugh! I am really sorry! I have lots of thoughts on the whole guild thing and 'judging' thing but I think they're best kept to myself! poo to them.Tauerethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09411353775134604182noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-73193907272206340282008-09-07T18:27:00.000+12:002008-09-07T18:27:00.000+12:00Susan, I'm not reject novice, so I can laugh at th...Susan, I'm not reject novice, so I can laugh at this, but I can well-imagine them sending this to novices or young persons, too. Can you imagine what that would do?<BR/><BR/>Peg, yeah, I've always been singing out of tune to the rest of the group. I think I'll wear this like a badge of honor. <BR/><BR/>Connie, yes, I'm moving on; westward in this case. Figured that's the best therapy. <BR/><BR/>Dave, <I><B>EXACTLY!</B></I> I think as participants of exhibitions we are used to the whim of selectors, our tastes not being similar to theirs, but "technical errors" is a factual statement that can be proven or refuted, and in this case they have a moral/organizational obligation to point out the errors, at least some of them. Like I said, I can't even agree to disagree! They would have been justified in saying, "not my thing, dear", without the burden of proof. I think it's just bad manners. <BR/><BR/>Dorothy, my own take, without knowing anything of the situation at Exhibition Central, is that they have a lot of works and since this exhibition is traveling they need to cull the numbers. So they just have stock throw-away comments they give out, thinking they sound as if they've studied the pieces carefully. <BR/><BR/>Dianne, someone who used to work on the inside of the National Guild suggested I ask Anne Curtis who was the technical adviser for weaving. Like email her nicely. The blurb said the selector's decisions are final, so I wouldn't be surprised if she rejects the email on that ground, but I am itching to know.Meghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01350447919000146804noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-63594049918687918152008-09-07T09:07:00.000+12:002008-09-07T09:07:00.000+12:00Hmmm. Disappointing but "liberating", yes. Neith...Hmmm. Disappointing but "liberating", yes. Neither Yanni nor the national Exhibition curator is a weaver so who gave the technical advice?<BR/>I've had pieces come back saying "not an exhibition piece" which says even less!Diannehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01401039267862076516noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-8927631649580919672008-09-07T06:28:00.000+12:002008-09-07T06:28:00.000+12:00How cruel the note is.I wonder what a "technical e...How cruel the note is.<BR/><BR/>I wonder what a "technical error" is when the result is acknowledged as "beautiful"?<BR/><BR/>Maybe this cursory note is identical to those sent with all rejected pieces, and is not therefore actually a comment on your work?Dorothyhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06488670649558382921noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-62209136205637464872008-09-07T06:17:00.000+12:002008-09-07T06:17:00.000+12:00SO sorry for the poor rejection. it would have bee...SO sorry for the poor rejection. it would have been nice for them to at least offer so much as ONE substantiating comment to the critique. She could have just left it at "I don't like it". <BR/>But, technical errors? And "too many"? <BR/>If it's any help, I adore your work, with or without "technical errors". It's those little things that make it YOURS. And, as someone who reads your blog, you're one of MY inspirations.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-77262249962026732572008-09-07T03:15:00.000+12:002008-09-07T03:15:00.000+12:00Sorry about the rejection -- and the form and cont...Sorry about the rejection -- and the form and content of that just added more bad juju. Sour grapes, I'd say, and move on. Your work is spectacular and don't forget that!Cate Rosehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04079028386218370915noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-37063285887875195892008-09-07T02:10:00.000+12:002008-09-07T02:10:00.000+12:00I think you are spot on about the blues singer in ...I think you are spot on about the blues singer in the church choir. Show your work elsewhere, but continue to support the guild in other ways.Peg in South Carolinahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07886923838871937466noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27254015.post-23863243080673894602008-09-07T00:23:00.000+12:002008-09-07T00:23:00.000+12:00I do think that letter is pretty rude and crude. I...I do think that letter is pretty rude and crude. If they are going to include the reason, I think they should do it in a more positive manner! My goodness! That would have crushed me!Susan B.https://www.blogger.com/profile/14429752925288151376noreply@blogger.com